In Kurdistan to be Kurdish was banned, to be Kurdish was made to be a source of shame. This for women meant no identity and a deeper exploitation of labour; persecution and violence had become fate.
Kurdistan is multi-colonial. Kurdistan is not a state, but it is proud to be the biggest stateless nation of the world. There were times previously where this was bemoaned of; however, this always succumbed to the pride that came with being the Middle East’s pioneering freedom movement struggling against Imperialism. In written history – written by the sovereigns – the name of Kurdistan, its existence, its culture and its people were never mentioned. This meant that Kurdistan was to be an unknown entity which was subsequently abandoned to the mercy of the sovereign states. This led to a struggle for existence, while existing. It is for this reason that only to be born in the midst of this history forces upon you a constant mode of resistance in which great sacrifices are made. This resistance and the sacrifices that come with it, take a deeper and intensified shape for the women of Kurdistan.
Today, millions of Kurdish women around the world regularly take the streets to struggle for their freedom. These are values that have derived from great resistance. In Kurdistan to be Kurdish was banned, to be Kurdish was made to be a source of shame. This for women meant no identity and a deeper exploitation of labour; persecution and violence had become fate.
The women of Kurdistan however, never accepted any of these as their destiny. To not accept this and to struggle, meant that they had to construct their own freedom. The Kurdish women’s search for freedom began with the Kurdistan Freedom Movement, or to be more precise, with the childhood dreams of Abdullah Ocalan. Even at a very early age Abdullah Ocalan’s disapproval of society’s extreme feudality was to show in his attempts to befriend girls of his age, and to include them in their games. At that very young age, even if it was not very consciously done, Abdullah Ocalan made resistance against society’s backward traditions a lifestyle in order to live freely with women and to live with free women.
Abdullah Ocalan’s desire to emancipate humanity through the emancipation of the woman was and is a fundamental motivator in his thoughts. The women of Kurdistan always played an active and leading role in the resistance. At first, the women of Kurdistan were organising themselves within the ranks of the Kurdistan Freedom Movement, the PKK. Although in the first years of the PKK there were not many women throughout the organisation, the women that had joined the PKK were women with insurmountable desires for women’s liberation. The role played by women in the PKK becoming a mass movement is extremely significant.
When the PKK began its guerrilla war on the 15th of August 1984, Kurdish women were pouring into the ranks of the PKK. At first, women were joining to liberate the Kurdish people through popular resistance, but through time it was becoming clear that there was a need for an independent path of resistance for the women of Kurdistan. When we analyse the feudal characteristics of Kurdish society of the time, it is understandable why Kurdish women decided to organise independently in order to better fulfil their role in the liberation movement.
Women fighters in the ranks of the PKK established YJWK (the Union of the Patriotic Women of Kurdistan) in 1987. YJWK is the first revolutionary and liberationist movement of the women of Kurdistan. This organisation was not only aimed at Kurdish women, revolutionary women from all over the world joined the organisation. The joining of the guerrilla ranks was not seen as a simple participation in a war. Guerrilla life was seen as the overcoming of the lifestyle asserted by the system by creating the will to live independently of any other external power.
Alongside the struggle against natural conditions, major efforts against the enemy and the patriarchal system were all administered hand in hand. This laid the foundations for a woman’s army. While the women of Kurdistan were being left with no identity, under the PKK women were forming armies. On the issue of a woman’s army our leader Apo stated: “a woman’s army is not only a requirement for the war against the patriarchal system, but is also a requirement in opposition to sexist mind-sets within the freedom movement. Instead of traditional lifestyles and relationships, relationships based on freedom must be adopted; the synthetic dependence of women to men must be overcome by free choice.”
The women of the PKK later formed YAJK (the Women’s Kurdistan Liberation Union) in the mountains of Kurdistan. YAJK was the women’s pioneer of war, education and self-evaluation and took on the responsibility of the transformation of men. This is how our leader Apo defined YAJK: First, YAJK means the attainment of the highest possible sentiments for one’s county. This means that even if everyone gives up on their country, YAJK continues the struggle. Second, YAJK is a reality of war. Here there is a national liberationist war. YAJK is well aware that this war is the fundamental component of its existence. War is a basic principle for YAJK. However, this does not only mean military war; this war is internal as much as it is external. Third, YAJK is a partisan force. It is most devoted to the principles and ideals of the party (PKK). Without the struggle of the PKK it is clear that the women’s liberation movement could not have taken these major strides. Therefore, the devotion and internalisation of the PKK is a vital responsibility for YAJK.
The 90’s was a time in which the war and international pressure intensified; however, it was also a time for developments and mass participation to the Women’s Liberation Movement. While Kurdish women were taking major military strides, they were also leading the mass resistances. As a result of these developments the now experienced movement was beginning to push for new openings. The year of 1997 was a year of significant progress for the woman’s liberation movement. On the 8th of March 1998, by announcing the Women’s Liberation Ideology our leader Apo integrated the struggle of the women of Kurdistan with the struggle of the women of the world. The announcement of this ideology in many ways represented a first among ideologies of societal emancipation. This ideology does not carry a simple ambition of the equality between the sexes. Rather, it aims to reorganise the whole of society by renovating the matriarchal order of life that existed in natural societies.
The Basic Principles of the Women’s Liberation Ideology
I. Patriotism: Our leader Apo says “Before everything women’s ideology cannot exist without land. The art of harvest and the art of production are connected to women’s artistry. This means that the first principle of the women’s ideology is a woman’s connection to the land it is born on; in other words, patriotism.”
II. The principle of free thought and free will: “the second principle is the woman’s ability to think freely and develop a free will in its participations to social life. If this ideology is to succeed, women must be able to live as they wish and make decisions accordingly. We must trust in their decisions and respect their will. This is an indispensible principle for this ideology.”
III. A sharing of life based on freedom and the principle of organisation: “For any of the above to materialise an organisational structure is vital. An unorganised individual is nothing. The first social structures are organised around women. Women must take their organisational structures seriously, as men have many organisations. Women must generalise their organisation – this is what today we are calling YAJK.
IV. The principle of resistance: “Women must see life as a domain for resistance. This is because without resistance women are being kept captive between four walls. Women are being loitered with simple tasks; therefore, to counter this, women must empower themselves by resisting in every possible way.
YAJK subsequently initiated educational seminars around these principles. The situation of the PKK militants in the mountains of Kurdistan enabled them to break off from the sovereign system and consequently enabled them to construct their own values and thought systems. For female militants this carried extra significance. The ability to carry out military actions, the ability to defend themselves and the ability to establish free thought brought about significant developments for female PKK militants. This led to the eventual establishment of PAJK (the Free Women’s Party of Kurdistan) which is today continuing this line of resistance.
Since the year 2000, our leader Apo’s new democratic, ecological and gender equal paradigm has been a complimentary addition to the history of the women’s struggle in Kurdistan. In Kurdistan the materialisation of this paradigm has been most evident in the women’s struggle. The fact that a fundamental aspect of the new paradigm is gender equality has integrated the women of Kurdistan with the women of the world.
The women of Kurdistan formed their democratic confederal umbrella organisation in 2005. This system is formed of four fundamental components:
1- The women’s ideological movement PAJK
2- The women’s social movement YJA (the Free Women’s Union)
3- The women’s self-defence force YJA-STAR
4- The young women’s organisation
The women of the Kurdistan freedom movement come together under the umbrella organisation called the KJB. These four main fields all organise and plan their work independently but come together in the formation of wider strategies. As we come to the end of an article in which we have tried to briefly introduce the Kurdistan women’s movement, it is probably appropriate to finish with the latest development: Jineology (the original version of this word is Kurdish and is derived from the Kurdish word for woman, jin. An exact definition would probably be womanology).
Jineology as a term was coined by our leader Apo as a fundamental scientific term in order to fill the gaps that the current social sciences are incapable of doing. Jineology is built on the principle that without the freedom of women within society and without a real consciousness surrounding women no society can call itself free. Jineology is formed on the criticism that existing scientific disciplines are structured within the framework of capitalist modernity and therefore are extremely divided and fragmented. Jineology, on the other hand, foresees a wholesome approach to humanity, society and the universe and this is why rather than being a new scientific discipline jineology is a new epistemological approach fuelled by a conscience of freedom.
Delal Afsin Nurhak
http://www.pkkonline.net/en/index.php?sys=article&;artID=180
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLIC
Fighter jets and Drones fly planes belonging to the occupying Turkish army flew over our Media Defence Area on the Zap region between 11.20 - 17.00 hours.
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLIC
The operation began by Occupier Turkish states army on the border line Haftanin and Uludere/Şırnak is countinuing
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLIC
The occupier TC army state began an operation border line on Uludere and Media Defence Area 10 days ago. The operation is continuing until now. The military ship is continuing to this region and there are conflicts between Guerrilla and the Occupier Turkish army sometimes.
- Details
The Media and Communication Centre of the HPG statement about the Turkish Army's Military Operation in Uludure:
The occupying Turkish army started a military Operation a few days ago at Uludere and Medya Defence Area border line. And it continued until now. The Operation continues with two Drones Fly planes and always carry to the military vehicles to this region too intensively.
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLIC
1. Fighter jets planes belonging to the occupying Turkish army flew over the Medya Defence Area on the Haftanin, Metina, Zap and Gare regions between 11:00 and 12:30 hours.
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLİC
Fighter jets planes belonging to the occupying Turkish army flew over the Media Defence Area on Zap,
- Details
If certain circles are in favour of a Syria in which no single force is dominant, then the position of the Kurds is pivotal
Erdogan recently visited the USA and it seems as if a comprehensive discussion was undertaken. This is at best, rare. The primary agenda was Syria. Within this framework the Kurdish question was a subheading. To be more precise these headings were discussed one within another.
The results of Erdogan’s visit to the USA have acknowledged the fact that the stance of the PKK and the Kurds of Western Kurdistan during this Syrian crisis has been the most accurate. It seems as if the USA, Russia, China and the West as a whole have brought themselves to a similar point. The Kurds have established themselves as a third way in Syria. They did not side with either the current regime or an opposition completely lacking in democratic and liberationist characteristics. Both sides were deemed insufficient. Consequently, they are proving in practice that a third way is possible. In fact, they are extending their claim that without an alternative to these ‘sides’ the crisis in Syria cannot be overcome. Currently the USA, Europe, Russia and China are in the search for a third way.
Bashar Esad will leave Syria and the Baas regime will cease to exist, but a Syria in which political Islam will be sovereign will not be acceptable. There will not be a single hegemony. It seems as if a democratic Syria in which all forces will coexist is inevitable. Political Islamists will not be side-lined as they were by the Baas regime, but they will also not be the primary power holders. A democratic reconciliation that will enable the coexistence of all ethnic, religious and social sections of the community will materialise. In this system the Kurds, Alevis and all other ethnic and religious communities will be able to express themselves and organise their societal affairs. Sunni Islam will also be able to express itself freely without the need for the establishment of its own hegemony.
This reality will make minorities like the Kurds and the Alevis a fundamental basis of democratisation in Syria. The Kurds have already proven this. The Alevis will eventually see that their one time hegemonic status will no longer persist and therefore it will be in their interest to strengthen the democratic mind-set. The Alevis can no longer insist on supporting an authoritarian rule. From now on any such insistence will endanger the ability of the Alevis to participate in the free and democratic future of Syria. Therefore, their very situation demands of them to be a force for democratic change. A Syria in which political Islam is not the hegemonic power is something that the Alevis can support. This option will also be strongly advocated by the Armenians, Assyrians, Yezidis, not to mention Women’s organisations and leftist democrats.
The USA, the EU and Russia will have to settle for a truly democratic Syria. Erdogan’s visit to the USA has shown this. The message to Turkey has been to not make itself an obstacle in front of this type of development. From now on, Turkey will stop supporting the efforts of radical Islamists. The message to the other more political Islamists that Turkey is in relationship with will be somewhat different: “consolidate your political existence and we will consolidate your positions in the newly formed Syria”. Turkey has been made to accept and adopt this new policy.
This policy does not completely fall in line with the Kurdish project; there are important differences. These forces will obviously be wanting to place their own collaborators within the system. However, the Kurds will be party to the third way solution in Syria. The Kurds will have their status and freedom accepted. In a democratised Syria their current gains will be protected; because for a Syria that wants to adopt the third way, this is imperative. If certain circles are in favour of a Syria in which no single force is dominant, then the position of the Kurds is pivotal. The moderate seeming opposition in Syria are in essence nationalists, hence its conservatism in regards to Kurdish rights. However, even they are in no position to reject the rights and freedoms of the Kurdish people. This is because the rejection of the rights of the Kurdish people is only possible in an authoritarian hegemony; the circumstances in the region, however, no longer allow for any such hegemony.
Esad, it seems, is on his way out, but the structure of the state is not about to be completely changed. The Baas party will continue to exist and Arab nationalism will also make itself felt. This Baas party however, will base itself on Sunni Arabs. The position of the Alevi Arabs necessitates that they steer clear of nationalism and the alienation of other communities. The political preferences of the Alevis will change in parallel with the formation of ‘new Syria’. The Alevis and the Kurds must be seen as the guarantors of a democratic Syria. The comprehension of this fact by international powers is a positive development. The current impasse has forced them to this. Turkey, after realising that the AKP’s policies were ineffective, has had to reluctantly approve of this new policy.
Erdogan’s statement that ‘we will oppose terrorism’ is meaningful. By this he does not mean the PYD, as he used to. Although in the meetings with the USA ‘the threat from PYD’ was mentioned, the organisation taht is seen as terrorist in Syria is the El-Nusra front, in other words, Al-Qaeda. The USA, the EU, Russia and China will take note of the opposition forces, but they will also move to isolate those that they have deemed as terrorist. Once this new project has matured and starts being deployed, those that stand in its way will also be done away with. Anyone wishing to prolong the conflict and sustain instability will also be eradicated. Any force that is not interested in becoming the new hegemonic force in Syria, but is hoping to take part in a democratic Syria will be able to do so. However, the new constitution will stand in the way of anyone fostering ambitions of being the new dictators of Syria.
These new circumstances will bring problems for Turkey and those organisations that it previously had ties with. Turkey, who has secret relations with Al-Qaeda in Iraq and supported this front in Syria, is now faced with an important decision; just as it has previously cut off strong ties it once had with Iran and the current Syrian regime, it must now do the same with organisations like Al-Qaeda. In short, Turkey’s previous approach of trying to please everyone has come to an abrupt end. Turkey is once again reorienting itself in-line with the Western camp that it has always been a part of. No longer will it make any incongruous outbursts. Saying this, if Turkey is successful in solving its Kurdish question and remains in pursuance of its own process of democratisation, than this will no doubt widen its area of manoeuvrability in the International arena. In the 21st century, the only way this external area of manoeuvrability can expand is through internal democratisation. It is extremely clear that from now on without extensive democratisation or without the formation of a democratic society, no force can adopt anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist policies. In Turkey this road passes through the solution of the Kurdish and Alevi questions and the question of radical democratisation.
It seems that one of the central outcomes of the AKP’s visit to the USA was an agreement on a Syrian project in which there is no place for a political Islamist hegemony. If the AKP, however, rather than pursuing hegemonic aspirations decides to insist on a democratised Turkey, it will firstly strengthen its own political foothold, and secondly, it will expand its scope of manoeuvrability in the face of international pressure.
Capitalist modernity has been forced to apply for a third way in Syria. Turkey has been brought to a stage where it too must solve its Kurdish question and also transform Turkey into a fully democratic country in which no community is hegemonic. The PKK leader saw an opportunity for exactly this and this is why he initiated the process of democratic solution. If this process is capped with success then it will not only be Turkey that is democratised, but the process itself will be a model for the solution of all problems encompassing the region. If Turkey really does want to be an effective force in the region, than it really must do so within the framework of democratic transformation. Only if Turkey becomes a beacon of democratic transformation can it have a positive impact on the developments in Syria. Contrary developments, however, will drag Turkey back to its previously ineffective role. Consequently, Turkey will only be a thorn in the side of all neighbouring countries; that which neighbouring countries will only want to neutralise.
Our sincere hope is that Turkey chooses to become a beacon of democracy and freedom as opposed to anything else.
Mustafa KARASU
http://www.pkkonline.net/en/index.php?sys=article&;artID=196
- Details
TO THE PRESS AND PUBLİC
1. Drones fly belonging to the occupying Turkish army flew over the Medya Defence Are on the Zagros region on the 8th fabruary between 10.00 and 23.00 hours. Also next day it was continue too intensively over the same region. It flew between 9.00 - 12.00 hours.
- Details
A society that is forced to deny its ontological roots cannot sustain a viable existence in the long-term.
Civilizational history of the Middle East is a history of denial and environmental destruction. History has taken this course as a dialectical consequence of the denial of Neolithic social values at the outset of material and moral civilization; while Neolithic society was both morally and materially ecological. The spiritual world of Neolithic society is based on an animate environment and is therefore immensely valued.
The roots of economy are based around the ability of the woman to provide nourishment. Women and nature are symbiotically unified. A natural animate spiritual understanding is symbolised by goddesses. The means for material production are mostly invented by women. Nourishment and clothing are dominated by women. All these values, however, were to be denied by the establishment of civilization and turned into means of exploitation and oppression by the new male hegemony. Mother Earth was to be deemed insignificant. Holy books were to state “women are your fields, plough them as you wish”.
Sumerian cities extensively began to chemically process the earth in the hunt for more profits which led to an increase in the desertification of an already growing desert. Civilizational development has had a very negative impact in the desertification of Mesopotamia. In the spiritual domain of civilization nature, the environment and the earth have always been deemed insignificant. This is no doubt an ideological approach; it is applied in order to degrade and easily govern the culture of agriculture that it perched and founded itself upon. Ideologically civilization has created an imaginary construct of the world in which it is deemed an enemy where humans find themselves only to render account of themselves. Once again Holy books state “The world is your place of examination”. On the other hand state elites have always created a worldly heaven for themselves, and have never believed in the religions that they themselves have invented; this is because they know only too well that they themselves have invented them. In fact, societal development as part of geo-biological evolution was to be consistently denied throughout civilizational progression (or actually regression), and covered up by imaginary and abstract constructs of a heaven.
The roots of the ecological problem lie within this framework. It is easy to understand that we are faced with a perilous social problem. A society that is forced to deny its ontological roots cannot sustain a viable existence in the long-term. This is why the exploitative and profit hunting mentality of the power elites and the ideological and military wars that come with it are anti-ecological, anti-biological and anti-societal. The depression that the financial age of the capitalist system now finds itself in is a clear signal of these truths. The fake world that they have constructed can no longer uphold its own lies. At no other time in history has humanity been so alienated from nature, life and sociality.
Abdullah OCALAN
- Details